If necessary due to noise we can take this discussion back to private@ for a check-in.
Mike Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 10, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Thanks Mike. Yours is the only feedback in a month. I am uncomfortable > contacting infra to make the changes based on so little input. > > Ralph > >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Mike Percy <mpe...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Sorry, I didn't see this message because of all the automated emails! >> >> +1 from me. >> >> Mike >> >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Currently all the messages from Jenkins, Jira and GitHub land in this >>> mailing list. That makes this mailing list very cluttered and it is easy to >>> miss discussions. Other projects use a “notifications” list to accept >>> emails from those sources so the dev list can be left for person-to-person >>> discussions. I would like to propose that Flume switch to this model. >>> Another alternative would be to have separate lists for each of those >>> sources. My personal viewpoint is simply separating the automated emails is >>> enough but I’d be willing to go along with any plan that moves the >>> automated emails to another list. I also think that doing this might >>> increase the number of subscribers on the Flume dev list as lots of people >>> don’t like to deal with all the extra email. >>> >>> All that said, it would be expected that all committers would subscribe to >>> these new lists. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Ralph >>> > >
