+1. I agree, we should move the private messages out. On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote:
> If necessary due to noise we can take this discussion back to private@ > for a check-in. > > Mike > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Dec 10, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Mike. Yours is the only feedback in a month. I am uncomfortable > contacting infra to make the changes based on so little input. > > > > Ralph > > > >> On Dec 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Mike Percy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Sorry, I didn't see this message because of all the automated emails! > >> > >> +1 from me. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Ralph Goers < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Currently all the messages from Jenkins, Jira and GitHub land in this > >>> mailing list. That makes this mailing list very cluttered and it is > easy to > >>> miss discussions. Other projects use a “notifications” list to accept > >>> emails from those sources so the dev list can be left for > person-to-person > >>> discussions. I would like to propose that Flume switch to this model. > >>> Another alternative would be to have separate lists for each of those > >>> sources. My personal viewpoint is simply separating the automated > emails is > >>> enough but I’d be willing to go along with any plan that moves the > >>> automated emails to another list. I also think that doing this might > >>> increase the number of subscribers on the Flume dev list as lots of > people > >>> don’t like to deal with all the extra email. > >>> > >>> All that said, it would be expected that all committers would > subscribe to > >>> these new lists. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Ralph > >>> > > > > > >
