Ross Gardler wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >What i am proposing now is an extra step. Remove the option > >"HEAD version" entirely from Jira. I think it is superfluous. > > Sorry - I'm reading too fast this morning. > > If a bug is introduced into head (i.e. wasn't in the previous release) > where would it go? The next release due I suppose. > > Seems fine to me.
Yes, that is what i meant. > Would it be worth naming the next release 0.8-dev and then renaming to > 0.8 when it is released? (not sure if Jira allows this, I assume it does). Yes, that avoids all confusion. Good idea. I just tested by moving 0.7 to 0.7-dev ... hooray. I will do that over the weekend unless someone stops me. --David
