David Crossley wrote: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > > Being "just" a warning that will produce lots of mails. That is why I > > added the note to the upgrading document. > > However the note is misleading. So i will try to improve > that documentation and link to the FAQs on the topic.
I changed it, as i think that you were describing the wrong thing. It was actually caused by FOR-1075, and FOR-1071 revealed it. Also showed the warning message that such users would receive. Thanks for trying to add the missing piece. I knew yesterday that i should have explained the warning message in the "upgrading" doc, but then forgot in the main commit. It is always easier if the original implementor describes issues. -David
