Hi All,

We really think fix done for GEODE-3023 should be considered for 1.2 version as 
well. Especially since similar fix(GEODE-2898) has been already made it to 1.2 
version. So shipping a partial/incomplete fix in 1.2 version for the same kind 
of problem does not really provide value, and still leaves the system exposed 
with a resiliency problem in case of network problems.

The problem is indeed critical, it is hitting on nearly every meaningfully 
large environment which has reasonable amount of network issues. It turns out 
that this problem is impacting entire Geode cluster, whenever there is Geode 
client with let say imperfect quality of network connectivity.  To overcome 
this SSL should be disabled for the cluster, which is not the best way to 
proceed.

Thanks,
Vahram.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Baker [mailto:aba...@pivotal.io] 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 7:42 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: release 1.2

Got it, thanks!

Anthony

> On Jun 10, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> I thought we had moved GEODE-3052 to a later release, given that we have a 
> work around for this.
> 
> --Udo
> 
> 
> On 6/10/17 10:15, Anthony Baker wrote:
>> Status update:
>> 
>> We have 2 issues left:  GEODE-3054 and GEODE-3052.  We also had a clean run 
>> of the Geode-release jenkins job.  So as soon as we can finish off these 
>> issues and get another clean run through Jenkins I’ll create a release 
>> candidate.  How does early next week sound?
>> 
>> Anthony
>> 
>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sounds good.  Please cherry-pick these changes onto release/1.2.0 when 
>>> ready.
>>> 
>>> Anthony
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I think we probably ought to include GEODE-3045 
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3045&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=9jqjvxoQ-RJtsGGvTMldMcrooymcWVqjQhb4GoQ1GQ8&e=
>>>>  > as well.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should also include the fix for GEODE-3054 in 1.2. This is a 
>>>>> bug that was introduced in the recent changes to the Gfsh parser, and 
>>>>> affects Windows pathnames specified in options to gfsh commands.
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=
>>>>>   
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=
>>>>>  >
>>>>> 
>>>>> The fix is currently in testing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd like to include the fix for GEODE-3052 in the 1.2 release. It's 
>>>>>> under review now and has passed new tests and is in precheckin testing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3052&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=T_2Qx57Vhl2-Z_X8qw8OOSwcKYzGBg0IFafSWdbIMPs&e=
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "Restarting 2 locators within 1s of each other causes potential locator 
>>>>>> split brain"
>>>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to