Vahram, 

Thanks for advocating for this issue!  While the release it pretty locked down 
for changes, this looks like a low risk change for an important issue.  I’ll 
cherry-pick the changes onto release/1.2.0.

I also see that a breaking change to the REST API was made in ‘c39585395a’.  
Can someone take a look at the message vs cause naming for errors?

Anthony

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Vahram Aharonyan <vaharon...@vmware.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We really think fix done for GEODE-3023 should be considered for 1.2 version 
> as well. Especially since similar fix(GEODE-2898) has been already made it to 
> 1.2 version. So shipping a partial/incomplete fix in 1.2 version for the same 
> kind of problem does not really provide value, and still leaves the system 
> exposed with a resiliency problem in case of network problems.
> 
> The problem is indeed critical, it is hitting on nearly every meaningfully 
> large environment which has reasonable amount of network issues. It turns out 
> that this problem is impacting entire Geode cluster, whenever there is Geode 
> client with let say imperfect quality of network connectivity.  To overcome 
> this SSL should be disabled for the cluster, which is not the best way to 
> proceed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vahram.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Baker [mailto:aba...@pivotal.io <mailto:aba...@pivotal.io>] 
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 7:42 PM
> To: dev@geode.apache.org <mailto:dev@geode.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: release 1.2
> 
> Got it, thanks!
> 
> Anthony
> 
>> On Jun 10, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>> 
>> I thought we had moved GEODE-3052 to a later release, given that we have a 
>> work around for this.
>> 
>> --Udo
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/10/17 10:15, Anthony Baker wrote:
>>> Status update:
>>> 
>>> We have 2 issues left:  GEODE-3054 and GEODE-3052.  We also had a clean run 
>>> of the Geode-release jenkins job.  So as soon as we can finish off these 
>>> issues and get another clean run through Jenkins I’ll create a release 
>>> candidate.  How does early next week sound?
>>> 
>>> Anthony
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Sounds good.  Please cherry-pick these changes onto release/1.2.0 when 
>>>> ready.
>>>> 
>>>> Anthony
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we probably ought to include GEODE-3045 
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3045&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=9jqjvxoQ-RJtsGGvTMldMcrooymcWVqjQhb4GoQ1GQ8&e=
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3045&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=9jqjvxoQ-RJtsGGvTMldMcrooymcWVqjQhb4GoQ1GQ8&e=>
>>>>>  > as well.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io 
>>>>>> <mailto:kh...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we should also include the fix for GEODE-3054 in 1.2. This is a 
>>>>>> bug that was introduced in the recent changes to the Gfsh parser, and 
>>>>>> affects Windows pathnames specified in options to gfsh commands.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3054&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=jSeNlEnjklIGLNnCF8I6cG0t06n2NT5xLBe86ewSmXc&e=>
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The fix is currently in testing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io 
>>>>>>> <mailto:bschucha...@pivotal.io>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'd like to include the fix for GEODE-3052 in the 1.2 release. It's 
>>>>>>> under review now and has passed new tests and is in precheckin testing.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3052&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=T_2Qx57Vhl2-Z_X8qw8OOSwcKYzGBg0IFafSWdbIMPs&e=
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_GEODE-2D3052&d=DwIFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=wpTWSXVvcGFCkFEMePbOecdHHTbyiIj9aWq7oqKb0J8&m=3eSDKrOEyEHtI5Oe9-iROOP-AWX9d-a1B-s9UX41yU4&s=T_2Qx57Vhl2-Z_X8qw8OOSwcKYzGBg0IFafSWdbIMPs&e=>
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Restarting 2 locators within 1s of each other causes potential locator 
>>>>>>> split brain"

Reply via email to