dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Nabarun Nag
  • Re: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Anthony Baker
  • Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Mario Ivanac
  • Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Mario Ivanac
  • Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Anthony Baker
  • Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Darrel Schneider
  • Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Mario Ivanac
  • Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Alberto Gomez
  • Odg: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Mario Ivanac
  • Re: Odg: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Alberto Gomez
  • Re: Geode retry/acknowledge improvement Bruce Schuchardt
• [DISCUSS] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
• Stats deprecations? Mark Hanson
  • Re: Stats deprecations? Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Stats deprecations? Dan Smith
  • Re: Stats deprecations? Mark Hanson
  • Re: Stats deprecations? Darrel Schneider
• [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Owen Nichols
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Donal Evans
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Dave Barnes
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 John Blum
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.12.2.RC1 Owen Nichols
• [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Bill Burcham
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Mark Hanson
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Jason Huynh
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Robert Houghton
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Jason Huynh
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Patrick Johnson
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Mark Hanson
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Mark Hanson
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Dale Emery
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Owen Nichols
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable John Blum
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Owen Nichols
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable John Blum
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable John Blum
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
  • Re: [VOTE] Requiring final keyword on every parameter and local variable Kirk Lund
• Failed: apache/geode-native#3075 (rel/v1.12.2.RC1 - 3e855a8) Travis CI
• Errored: apache/geode-examples#539 (rel/v1.12.2.RC1 - 8ad8ac0) Travis CI
• Canceled: apache/geode-examples#537 (support/1.12 - 682f06a) Travis CI
• [RFC PROPOSAL] Geode Compatibility with Redis data sharding and cluster changes Jens Deppe
  • Re: [RFC PROPOSAL] Geode Compatibility with Redis data sharding and cluster changes Jacob Barrett
• [DISCUSS] Monthly, synchronous community meetings Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly, synchronous community meetings Alberto Gomez
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly, synchronous community meetings Dan Smith
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly, synchronous community meetings Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly, synchronous community meetings Alexander Murmann
• Upcoming upgrade to Gradle 6.8.3 Dale Emery
• [DISCUSS] Pull Request (PR) check list Anilkumar Gingade
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Pull Request (PR) check list Jacob Barrett
• [DISCUSS and NOMINATE] Time for a new Geode PMC Chair Karen Miller
  • Re: [DISCUSS and NOMINATE] Time for a new Geode PMC Chair Anthony Baker
• Deleting old references to ticket numbers and avoiding new ones Hale Bales
  • Re: Deleting old references to ticket numbers and avoiding new ones Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Deleting old references to ticket numbers and avoiding new ones Donal Evans
  • Re: Deleting old references to ticket numbers and avoiding new ones Dave Barnes
• [Proposal] backport GEODE-8761 to support/1.14 Darrel Schneider
  • Re: [Proposal] backport GEODE-8761 to support/1.14 Nabarun Nag
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.13.2 Dick Cavender
• request for people putting up pull requests Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: request for people putting up pull requests Alexander Murmann
• Fixed: apache/geode-native#3070 (master - d4ca2b9) Travis CI
• Passed: apache/geode-native#3067 (rel/v1.13.2 - 85b6261) Travis CI
• Very old geode-native PRs Blake Bender
  • Re: Very old geode-native PRs Mario Salazar de Torres
• Passed: apache/geode-examples#533 (rel/v1.13.2 - f52ac92) Travis CI
• Apache Geode 1.13.2 Release Dick Cavender
• Precheckin job failed to fork JVM during compile Kirk Lund
  • Re: Precheckin job failed to fork JVM during compile Donal Evans
• CODEWATCHERS file effects Alberto Gomez
  • Re: CODEWATCHERS file effects Owen Nichols
  • Re: CODEWATCHERS file effects Alberto Gomez
  • Re: CODEWATCHERS file effects Owen Nichols
  • Re: CODEWATCHERS file effects Alberto Gomez
• [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Ernie Burghardt
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Sarah Abbey
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Donal Evans
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Geode Committer - Matt Reddington Joris Melchior
• [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Darrel Schneider
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Mark Hanson
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Mario Salazar de Torres
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Dave Barnes
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Mike Martell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Dan Smith
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Jens Deppe
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface John Blum
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Charlie Black
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface John Blum
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Charlie Black
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Dan Smith
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Joris Melchior
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Bruce Schuchardt
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Jens Deppe
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Udo Kohlmeyer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface John Hutchison
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface John Hutchison
  • Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface Mark Hanson
• Last 3 unit tests using PowerMock Kirk Lund
• [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Alberto Gomez
  • Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Alberto Gomez
  • Re: [INFO] Apache Geode 1.14.0 Release Manager Nabarun Nag
• [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Owen Nichols
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Backporting to support branches Nabarun Nag
• PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries Jens Deppe
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries Nabarun Nag
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries Joris Melchior
  • Re: PROPOSAL: Backport GEODE-9044 - Introduce RedisKey as key object for RedisData entries Jens Deppe
• [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9032 to support/1.14 Hale Bales
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9032 to support/1.14 Owen Nichols
• org.jetbrains.annotations does not exist Kirk Lund
  • Re: org.jetbrains.annotations does not exist Kirk Lund
• [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9045 to support/1.14 Hale Bales
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9045 to support/1.14 Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9045 to support/1.14 Darrel Schneider
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9045 to support/1.14 Joris Melchior
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9045 to support/1.14 Owen Nichols
• Concourse geode-native permissions Mario Salazar de Torres
  • Re: Concourse geode-native permissions Owen Nichols
  • Re: Concourse geode-native permissions Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Concourse geode-native permissions Mario Salazar de Torres
  • RE: Concourse geode-native permissions Blake Bender
  • Re: Concourse geode-native permissions Mario Salazar de Torres
• [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Alberto Gomez
  • Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Jacob Barrett
  • Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Anthony Baker
  • Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Mario Ivanac
  • Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback Anthony Baker
• Proposal to backport GEODE-9001 to 1.14 John Hutchison
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-9001 to 1.14 Darrel Schneider
  • Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-9001 to 1.14 Owen Nichols
• Apache ID for contributor status Raymond Ingles
• [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9029 - Initial support for Redis SLOWLOG command Raymond Ingles
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9029 - Initial support for Redis SLOWLOG command Darrel Schneider
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9029 - Initial support for Redis SLOWLOG command Owen Nichols
• CODEOWNERS vs CODEWATCHERS Owen Nichols
  • RE: CODEOWNERS vs CODEWATCHERS Alberto Bustamante Reyes
  • Re: CODEOWNERS vs CODEWATCHERS Owen Nichols
• [PROPOSAL]: Backport redis-compatibility changes to 1.14 - GEODE-9021 and GEODE-9023 Jens Deppe
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport redis-compatibility changes to 1.14 - GEODE-9021 and GEODE-9023 Darrel Schneider
  • Re: [PROPOSAL]: Backport redis-compatibility changes to 1.14 - GEODE-9021 and GEODE-9023 Owen Nichols
• [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9009 - Support for Redis DECRBY command Raymond Ingles
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9009 - Support for Redis DECRBY command Owen Nichols
• [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9022 to Apache Geode 1.14 Raymond Ingles
  • Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9022 to Apache Geode 1.14 Owen Nichols
• Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list Donal Evans
  • Re: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list Nabarun Nag
  • Re: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list Owen Nichols
  • Re: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list Jacob Barrett
  • Re: Proposal: Add GEODE-8950 (performance degradation in P2pPartitionedPutLongBenchmark) to 1.14 blockers list Donal Evans
• [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Donal Evans
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dave Barnes
  • RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Mark Hanson
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dan Smith
  • Re: [Suspected Spam] RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Nabarun Nag
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Alexander Murmann
  • RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Alexander Murmann
  • RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dick Cavender
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Alexander Murmann
  • Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Donal Evans
  • RE: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Dick Cavender

• Earlier messages
• Later messages