On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:32 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > No.
I disagree. Please see the discussion on private@incubator for more context. I'd be happy to see you reopen the question on general@incubator if you feel strongly about having a truly public discussion. > Votes to admit (or expunge) the roster should never be by lazy consensus. > I think the IPMC (or Board, in the post-incubation TLP world) would express > serious reservations. Please vote, folks, we need 3 +1's on such issues, > but it should reflect a clear plurality. This one is a special case of "amending" an existing proposal. > Roman, please address my concern for putting forward the vote for all 6(?) > for both commit + PPMC. It doesn't matter that we made this policy, we > must be explicit in nominations/votes, for when or if the two become > distinct. See above. Thanks, Roman.
