+1 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Kirk Lund <kl...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Yep, having 99% of the code in org.apache.geode pkgs with 1% in > com.gemstone.gemfire pkgs just to facilitate rolling upgrades seems like > something that would be reasonable to discuss on general@incubator. > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Hey, if we can do this then we should leave versions of exception classes > > in com.gemstone.gemfire so we can send them to old GemFire clients! If > we > > do that and swizzle package names in DataSerializer maybe we'll be able > to > > support migration of GemFire clients to Geode. That would facilitate > > faster adoption of Geode by users of the commercial product. > > > > > > > > > > Le 7/2/2015 12:28 PM, Sean Busbey a écrit : > > > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:25 PM, William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >> My reading of that is it's specifically for incubation, which indeed is > >>> not > >>> required based on this thread > >>> < > >>> > >>> > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev@geode.incubator.apache.org&q=subject:%22Package+renaming%5C%3F%22&o=newest&f=1 > >>> . > >>> > >>> But for leaving incubation and becoming a TLP my understanding was that > >>> it > >>> is required. > >>> > >>> > >>> Many projects leave code in packages that are not org.apache for > >> backwards > >> compatibility. > >> > >> Roman is correct, if you want to have things outside of org.apache you > >> should bring up the matter on general@incubator. Including the > reasoning > >> for having things outside of org.apache and the long term plan (if any) > >> for > >> moving things will help avoid a longer set of questions. > >> > >> > >> > > > -- William Markito Oliveira -- For questions about Apache Geode, please write to *dev@geode.incubator.apache.org <dev@geode.incubator.apache.org>*
