+1 On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Dick Cavender <dcaven...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 > > > On 7/2/2015 4:58 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Le 7/2/2015 2:06 PM, Kirk Lund a écrit : >> >>> Yep, having 99% of the code in org.apache.geode pkgs with 1% in >>> com.gemstone.gemfire pkgs just to facilitate rolling upgrades seems like >>> something that would be reasonable to discuss on general@incubator. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Bruce Schuchardt < >>> bschucha...@pivotal.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, if we can do this then we should leave versions of exception >>>> classes >>>> in com.gemstone.gemfire so we can send them to old GemFire clients! If >>>> we >>>> do that and swizzle package names in DataSerializer maybe we'll be able >>>> to >>>> support migration of GemFire clients to Geode. That would facilitate >>>> faster adoption of Geode by users of the commercial product. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 7/2/2015 12:28 PM, Sean Busbey a écrit : >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:25 PM, William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My reading of that is it's specifically for incubation, which indeed >>>>> is >>>>> >>>>>> not >>>>>> required based on this thread >>>>>> < >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dev@geode.incubator.apache.org&q=subject:%22Package+renaming%5C%3F%22&o=newest&f=1 >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> But for leaving incubation and becoming a TLP my understanding was >>>>>> that >>>>>> it >>>>>> is required. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Many projects leave code in packages that are not org.apache for >>>>>> >>>>> backwards >>>>> compatibility. >>>>> >>>>> Roman is correct, if you want to have things outside of org.apache you >>>>> should bring up the matter on general@incubator. Including the >>>>> reasoning >>>>> for having things outside of org.apache and the long term plan (if any) >>>>> for >>>>> moving things will help avoid a longer set of questions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> > -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
