+1
On 7/2/2015 4:58 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
+1
Le 7/2/2015 2:06 PM, Kirk Lund a écrit :
Yep, having 99% of the code in org.apache.geode pkgs with 1% in
com.gemstone.gemfire pkgs just to facilitate rolling upgrades seems like
something that would be reasonable to discuss on general@incubator.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Bruce Schuchardt
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hey, if we can do this then we should leave versions of exception
classes
in com.gemstone.gemfire so we can send them to old GemFire clients!
If we
do that and swizzle package names in DataSerializer maybe we'll be
able to
support migration of GemFire clients to Geode. That would facilitate
faster adoption of Geode by users of the commercial product.
Le 7/2/2015 12:28 PM, Sean Busbey a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:25 PM, William Markito <[email protected]>
wrote:
My reading of that is it's specifically for incubation, which
indeed is
not
required based on this thread
<
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Package+renaming%5C%3F%22&o=newest&f=1
.
But for leaving incubation and becoming a TLP my understanding was
that
it
is required.
Many projects leave code in packages that are not org.apache for
backwards
compatibility.
Roman is correct, if you want to have things outside of org.apache you
should bring up the matter on general@incubator. Including the
reasoning
for having things outside of org.apache and the long term plan (if
any)
for
moving things will help avoid a longer set of questions.
