-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49962/#review146361
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messenger/JGroupsMessenger.java
 (line 895)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/49962/#comment212757>

    I don't think this can be transparent, but at the same time do we really 
need static methods on GMSMember for this when there are already instance 
methods?  I also prefer the method names in InternalDistributedMember 
(write/readEssentialData) because "shallow" to me means not recursing into 
contained objects, such as "shallow copy".


- Bruce Schuchardt


On Aug. 10, 2016, 9:25 p.m., Hitesh Khamesra wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49962/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 10, 2016, 9:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Bruce Schuchardt and Udo Kohlmeyer.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed extra fields from distributedmember while serialization/de. Planning 
> to do this in udp-security branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/GMSMember.java
>  d5d0b8e 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/interfaces/JoinLeave.java
>  87409c5 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
>  080bdb3 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messenger/JGroupsMessenger.java
>  5c0a327 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/GMSMemberJUnitTest.java
>  7eef594 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49962/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hitesh Khamesra
> 
>

Reply via email to