If Travis CI is only run on pull requests then that is not enough because
committers do not submit pull requests. Having it run during the gradle
build or precheckin target is also needed. In addition to that I also
wanted PRs to be checked.


On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> It would certainly be necessary to make sure that the code style to be
> enforced is sensible, e.g. doe not use wildcard imports.  We would also
> want to make one large commit to format all existing code before turning
> this on.
>
> Mark - Thank you for the information about the existing setup.
>
> Mark, Darrel, Kevin - Given all of your comments, I think it might make
> more sense to add the flag to enable it in Travis CI rather than as part
> of  the build.  This way your build pass regardless of whitespace, but the
> CI job would fail on PRs if they did not adhere to the standard formatting.
>
> Anthony - It doesn’t seem to me that turning this on would have the effect
> of combining reformatting commits and logic changes.  Rather, since all
> code would already be formatted, there would no longer be any reformatting
> commits except for single large commits when the code style file was
> updated.
>
> > On Oct 12, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > I like the idea of doing this but I don't think Checkstyle should be
> enabled until all of the code is reformatted.
> >
> > Also, last time I checked there was still a problem with the IntelliJ
> auto-format settings.  It still used wildcard imports, which I believe we
> don't allow.  I've manually changed my settings in Editor->Code Style->Java
> to "Use single class import" to correct that problem.  I couldn't see how
> to get Gradle to do it.
> >
> >
> > Le 10/12/2016 à 10:28 AM, Anthony Baker a écrit :
> >> Source code with a consistent look-and-feel makes it easier for people
> to join the project community and contribute.
> >>
> >> Let’s continue to keep reformatting commits separate from logic
> changes—otherwise it’s too hard to review.
> >>
> >> Anthony
> >>
> >>> On Oct 12, 2016, at 10:06 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> This might be a good time to reformat the code since I don't think
> there
> >>> are too many long lived feature branches outstanding.
> >>>
> >>> -Dan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I would like to advocate for adding a Checkstyle <http://checkstyle.
> >>>> sourceforge.net/> or Spotless <https://github.com/diffplug/spotless>
> >>>> gradle task to our build process to ensure that all code checked in
> meets
> >>>> the formatting standards described on the wiki <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> >>>> confluence/display/GEODE/Code+Style+Guide> (and in the
> intellij/eclipse
> >>>> formatter xml files in our repository). This will alleviate
> difficulties
> >>>> reviewing code when whitespace or formatting has changed since all
> code
> >>>> checked in will already comply with standards.
> >
>
>

Reply via email to