+1 to Dan +1 to Bruce - the distributedTest extensions for backward compatibility would great
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > +1 > > I still have the backward-compatibility distributedTest extensions that I > could contribute. The extension lets you spawn a VM running an older version > and interact with it. You can even run a unit test in the spawned VM. > > I have one test that sets up a server using the current version and then > spawns a client unit test running under an older version. The client finds > the server through the distributedTest locator and runs its tests against the > server. > > > Le 11/1/2016 à 4:04 PM, Jianxia Chen a écrit : >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We made a lot of changes in 1.0 that broke compatibility with old versions >>> of gemfire for various reasons (package renaming, changing membership >>> system). I just wanted to confirm that starting with 1.1, we're planning on >>> maintaining client/server, peer-to-peer, WAN and disk backwards >>> compatibility with older versions geode as outlined in this wiki page: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Managing+Backward+ >>> Compatibility >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/ >>> Criteria+for+Code+Submissions >>> >>> Now that we have 1.0 out the door, we need to be more careful about >>> introducing changes that might break compatibility if we're going to stick >>> to these guidelines. We also probably should introduce some tests that >>> check compatibility with 1.0. >>> >>> >>> -Dan >>> >
