+1 for maintaining backwards compatibility.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases.
>
> --Mark
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +1 to Dan
> > +1 to Bruce - the distributedTest extensions for backward compatibility
> > would great
> >
> > > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I still have the backward-compatibility distributedTest extensions that
> > I could contribute.  The extension lets you spawn a VM running an older
> > version and interact with it.  You can even run a unit test in the
> spawned
> > VM.
> > >
> > > I have one test that sets up a server using the current version and
> then
> > spawns a client unit test running under an older version.  The client
> finds
> > the server through the distributedTest locator and runs its tests against
> > the server.
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 11/1/2016 à 4:04 PM, Jianxia Chen a écrit :
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> We made a lot of changes in 1.0 that broke compatibility with old
> > versions
> > >>> of gemfire for various reasons (package renaming, changing membership
> > >>> system). I just wanted to confirm that starting with 1.1, we're
> > planning on
> > >>> maintaining client/server, peer-to-peer, WAN and disk backwards
> > >>> compatibility with older versions geode as outlined in this wiki
> page:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Managing+Backward+
> > >>> Compatibility
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/
> > >>> Criteria+for+Code+Submissions
> > >>>
> > >>> Now that we have 1.0 out the door, we need to be more careful about
> > >>> introducing changes that might break compatibility if we're going to
> > stick
> > >>> to these guidelines. We also probably should introduce some tests
> that
> > >>> check compatibility with 1.0.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -Dan
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to