Right, to be enterprise class software product, it needs to be backward
compatible...We also need to consider rolling upgrade of the system....

Thanks, Dan, Bruce for the write-up and frame-work...

-Anil.


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:37 AM, William Markito Oliveira <
william.mark...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for maintaining backwards compatibility.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for backward compatibility with Geode releases.
> > >
> > > --Mark
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Kenneth Howe <kh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to Dan
> > > > +1 to Bruce - the distributedTest extensions for backward
> compatibility
> > > > would great
> > > >
> > > > > On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <
> bschucha...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > I still have the backward-compatibility distributedTest extensions
> > that
> > > > I could contribute.  The extension lets you spawn a VM running an
> older
> > > > version and interact with it.  You can even run a unit test in the
> > > spawned
> > > > VM.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have one test that sets up a server using the current version and
> > > then
> > > > spawns a client unit test running under an older version.  The client
> > > finds
> > > > the server through the distributedTest locator and runs its tests
> > against
> > > > the server.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 11/1/2016 à 4:04 PM, Jianxia Chen a écrit :
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> We made a lot of changes in 1.0 that broke compatibility with old
> > > > versions
> > > > >>> of gemfire for various reasons (package renaming, changing
> > membership
> > > > >>> system). I just wanted to confirm that starting with 1.1, we're
> > > > planning on
> > > > >>> maintaining client/server, peer-to-peer, WAN and disk backwards
> > > > >>> compatibility with older versions geode as outlined in this wiki
> > > page:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/
> > Managing+Backward+
> > > > >>> Compatibility
> > > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/
> > > > >>> Criteria+for+Code+Submissions
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Now that we have 1.0 out the door, we need to be more careful
> about
> > > > >>> introducing changes that might break compatibility if we're going
> > to
> > > > stick
> > > > >>> to these guidelines. We also probably should introduce some tests
> > > that
> > > > >>> check compatibility with 1.0.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> -Dan
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ~/William
>

Reply via email to