On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:23:35PM -0500, David Blevins wrote: > I could help but know little to nothing about Confluence. Are there > any Confluence devs out there who would be willing to answer questions > on irc or something from time to time?
Yes, Mike [1] just volunteered IRC/IM support from any Confluence devs who happen to be awake. Otherwise mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], or if it's ASF-specific, give me a poke. --Jeff [1] Mike Cannon-brookes is substantially to blame for Confluence - his IM details are at http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -David > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 11:51:12AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote: > > Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF > > Confluence instance? Requirements for the job: > > > > a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years > > b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance > > c) somewhat unix-savvy > > d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do things > > like upgrades > > > > If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to hold a > > (PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice. > > They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is ready. > > > > > > --Jeff > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote: > > > >Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence? Like > > > >someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I don't > > > >know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis. > > > > > > Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit > > > test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use etc. > > > > > > Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with bugzilla. > > > If you've used both you'll know what I mean. > > > > > > > > > >It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand > > > >the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over to > > > >a different wiki system, with yet another syntax... > > > > > > There's not that much content. But we could start with just the manual > > > in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this > > > internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old > > > wiki stays around for a while its no biggie > > > > > > James > > > ------- > > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > >
