On 23 Jul 2004, at 02:51, Jeff Turner wrote:
Would anyone else be willing to help with care and feeding of an ASF Confluence instance? Requirements for the job:
a) an ASF committer, preferably been around a few years
b) know how to deploy a webapp and admin a Tomcat instance
c) somewhat unix-savvy
d) willing to commit random bits of time for months to come to do things
like upgrades
If there's a volunteer or two, I guess the next steps would be to hold a
(PMC-ratified) vote and send a mail off to infrastructure@ for advice.
They may wish to delay installation until a successor to nagoya is ready.
--Jeff
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 05:11:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Jul 2004, at 17:15, Matt Kurjanowicz wrote:Hmm, are we moving a little too fast on moving to Confluence? Like someone said earlier, we've already switched wiki's once, and I don't know (beyond wiki -> xdoc) what benefits Confluence has over Wikis.
Security, features, wiki language, macros for integrating with unit test code / JIRA reports - but mostly its just a nice tool to use etc.
Its like saying, hey this JIRA things OK but whats wrong with bugzilla.
If you've used both you'll know what I mean.
It may even be easier to update the tool (wiki->xdoc) to understand
the wiki we have now, rather than transferring the entire site over to
a different wiki system, with yet another syntax...
There's not that much content. But we could start with just the manual in the new wiki, then see how we get on. The great thing about this internet thing is we can link across websites :). So even if the old wiki stays around for a while its no biggie
James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
