On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
final push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not just
branch for the stable, and head is unstable?
The names are just suggestions - "trunk", "head", "unstable",
whatever.
The important thing is that you can easily checkout and build each
tree on its own so we can't have both stable and unstable branches
of modules (e.g. transaction) under trunk.
right - this is SVN, so the standard branching model actually doesn't
work. We'll need the branches outside of /trunk anyway
so we have /trunk and /branches/stable and /branches/unstable, the
former for release work, and the latter for really nutty stuff that
people want to work on, and head is where mainline development
continues?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
