On May 27, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the
final push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not
just branch for the stable, and head is unstable?
The names are just suggestions - "trunk", "head", "unstable",
whatever.
The important thing is that you can easily checkout and build each
tree on its own so we can't have both stable and unstable branches
of modules (e.g. transaction) under trunk.
right - this is SVN, so the standard branching model actually
doesn't work. We'll need the branches outside of /trunk anyway
so we have /trunk and /branches/stable and /branches/unstable, the
former for release work, and the latter for really nutty stuff that
people want to work on, and head is where mainline development
continues?
(What I'm saying is that I agree with you... we have no real choice
because of how SVN does branches. We clearly need to separate stable
from unstable ongoing work)
geir
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
