On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:40:52AM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >Clearly, we need something like this to get organized around the final > >push for certification and the 1.0 release, by why not just branch for > >the stable, and head is unstable? > > > > The names are just suggestions - "trunk", "head", "unstable", whatever. > > The important thing is that you can easily checkout and build each tree > on its own so we can't have both stable and unstable branches of modules > (e.g. transaction) under trunk. >
I think we are going to have a hard enough time managing and merging between stable/unstable branches of the code in general let alone at the submodule level. I'd prefer to get used to that before trying it at the submodule level. -David
