+1
Definitely the right direction.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 4/23/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we including ldap in the main distro, or shipping it as a
plugin? If it is the latter, we can ship it late if needed.
Great point! We can even post what we've got today as the 0.92 plugin
and then post a new plugin version later. (In fact the 0.92 plugin is
on the plugin site already, though we'll want to rebuild it against
the final 1.1 G code when that comes out.)
I guess this means we need to start moving things like directory out
of our main tree so they can be versioned separately.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Apr 23, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it. Alex, are the
updates significant?
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Depends. Since we're focusing on getting the 1.1 release out I'm
not sure we'll have time. Jeff would have to comment on his
availability to test, etc.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
You guys have time for the latest RC2 release of Directory? We
could push this release for G to get a bunch of fixes and
performance enhancements in there.
Alex
Jeff Genender wrote:
Yeah, I can take a look.
Jeff
Aaron Mulder wrote:
All,
While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out
of date
(0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio). I also found that if we just
"take the latest of everything Directory-related" it blows up (in
particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to).
Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-
related libs
and update our etc/project.properties accordingly?
Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm
not sure
if you want to bite on this.
It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory
behind, but it would be nice if we could update.
Thanks,
Aaron
