Actually...let me rephrase that...Bill Dudney and I will put it together... ;-)
Jeff Jeff Genender wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for the ping. Let me see what I can get together... > > Jeff > > > > Greg Wilkins wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> this suggestion is probably too late.... >> >> but given the deficiencies of dialin, would it be possible for you to post a >> short >> summary of where your work with clustering is at? >> >> Is there a page on the(a?) wiki about the approach you are taking? >> I can see the tomcat clustering page >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/clustering.html >> >> and the overview page >> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/clustering.html >> >> but nothing on kluster or the session API >> >> cheers >> >> >> >> >> Jeff Genender wrote:> >>> Jules Gosnell wrote: >>>> Guys, >>>> >>>> Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday. >>>> >>>> I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you were hoping >>>> for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry. >>>> >>>> One further problem. We were not able to organise conferencing >>>> facilities. If anyone thinks that they can work around this, perhaps via >>>> skype or something, I would be happy to try to set something up - Has >>>> anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5 participants before ? Would >>>> you like us to try? >>>> >>> Well, thats ok...thanks for giving a shot. >>> >>> I would ask that we bring as much to the lists afterwards as there are >>> others who have/are doing considerable work in the clustering area and >>> are not able to be there. It would be nice to be engaged in >>> discussions. Thanks again for trying. >>> >>>> Jules >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin time. >>>>>>> 2200 is good from my perspective. >>>>>> That's a little later than I was hoping for - my worry would be that >>>>>> people who might otherwise be there will have packed up and gone home >>>>>> by then. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would rather a slot somewhere between 6:00pm and 9:00pm... >>>>>> >>>>>> How does that sound ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jules >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Evening you time would be best for me. It looks like there is an 8 >>>>>>>> hour time diff between Dublin and California, so anything after 6pm >>>>>>>> your time would be good for me (10am here). I can go maybe an hour >>>>>>>> earlier, but then I will be sleepy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -dain >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jeff Genender wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dain Sundstrom wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the >>>>>>>>>>>> conference can participate? >>>>>>>>>>> I'll look into it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ? >>>>>>>>>> I would likely be interested too depending on time. >>>>>>>>> OK, Jeff - so are there any windows on thurs aft/eve (dublin time) >>>>>>>>> which would not suit you ? Let us know, so that we can avoid them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jules >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jules >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -dain >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jules Gosnell wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt - I don't think that the problem was with sponsorship, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but rather >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?). Covalent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are simply >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> providing a room and beer. The invitation is open to the entire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community and you will be driving the meeting. >>>>>>>>>>> That should be cool. Firstly, it has been announced here in the >>>>>>>>>>> public list. Secondly, you should consider putting up a few >>>>>>>>>>> notice signs around ApacheCon to catch interested people who >>>>>>>>>>> didn't see this. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, exclusion and lack of openness was the issue. The sponsorship >>>>>>>>>>> was mud in the water. By mentioning this here the issue is >>>>>>>>>>> rendered >>>>>>>>>>> nonexistent. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course, you need to post (here and on those paper notices) the >>>>>>>>>>> details, such as time and place, as soon as they're figured out. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jules. And thanks for raising this, Matt, so it can be >>>>>>>>>>> clarified a bit. >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> #ken P-)} >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ >>>>>>>>>>> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Millennium hand and shrimp!" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a piece of >>>>>>>>> string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-system >>>>>>>>> crystallises out around it." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> /********************************** >>>>>>>>> * Jules Gosnell >>>>>>>>> * Partner >>>>>>>>> * Core Developers Network (Europe) >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> * www.coredevelopers.net >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> * Open Source Training & Support. >>>>>>>>> **********************************/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
