I have tried to be constructive... but I can only go so far until I start to shutdown...
So far I've responded to Jacek several times about creating an issue. The first was a response to a question if he should create an issue, and I said yes. So after several more emails still talking about no issue and me responding with affirmation to create one... I really don't have much more patience nor do I really know to best and constructively respond to a situation like that. And I really, really don't see how else I could have possibly responded to his statement in any other constructive manner, about not understanding my query after I had though that I really, clearly stated exactly what I was asking. --jason On 7/24/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason, Do you think you could answer your peers a little bit more constructively? Your answers to people are a bit caustic and it is not helping promote a healthy environment. Is there something that we can help with to aid in a more amicable interaction with your peers? Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: >> I don't understand why it hasn't been reported in JIRA? An issue is >> not known unless it's reported in JIRA where people (like me) can >> notice it. I don't think the community follows each and every thread >> that's in dev@, so how could they know about it? > > So, for the 3rd time... file an issue. > > >>> Really don't understand why we have to bounce back and forth for >>> several days to get something done. For example, I asked you for the >>> "length path" you ran under... and instead of actually giving me the >>> path which I asked for you, you give some explanation of why you were >>> in the lengthy past which I did not even ask for. >> >> I'm sounding as repeating myself, but as I didn't get the point I >> didn't respond as you requested. I believe the answer above is >> sufficient. As you wished ;-) > > How else would one answer the question "What is the lengthy path you ran > under?" except with the exact *lengthy path*? > > --jason
