Great, I'll be looking forward to it.
-David
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or else send
you a a patch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/23/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the
intention of
> using it for G's testsuite. The junit test code will have to go
under
> the ejbcontainer-testsuite under the testsuite framework
> (geronimo/testsuite).
I don't know which approach would make sense or if there is some
middle ground. You have a copy of this migrated code somewhere I
could look at/try out?
If we did #2 it'd obviously be a copy as OpenEJB 3 runs those tests
about 7 times during an average build and another 5 more times on a
build with assemblies.
-David
> The beans and the ejub jars can go just about anywhere. So I'd
like
> to solicit the suggestion of openejb and geronimo folks on where we
> should place them
>
> 1) Leave them where they are under openejb2/modules/openejb-itests.
> Get help from openejb commiters to get this commited. Unlike in
> previous G releases, this module would now only build the ejb
jars. No
> tests would actually run here.
>
> 2) Move/copy the ejbs to some place under testsuite and create the
> jars there. This will keep the ejbs and the tests together.
Since the
> moduleId (configId) in the plans should match the m2
artifactItem id
> (g:a:v:t), the moduleId in the ejb plans would then become
> o.a.g.testsuite.*
>
>
> Apart from this decision, other things that need to resolved
before we
> put this code in are
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-288
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg34995.html
>
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
