On Oct 27, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

http://people.apache.org/~prasad/ejb-modules.zip

You may remove the <parent> from the top level pom and adjust the
<groupId> appropriately to build this.

Looks like you have the beans in there.  Where is the test code?

-David

Cheers
Prasad

On 10/25/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great, I'll be looking forward to it.

-David

On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:

> Thanx David. I shall try to put it in a sandbox if I can, or else send
> you a a patch.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 10/23/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>
>> > I have migrated the openejb-itests module to m2 with the
>> intention of
>> > using it for G's testsuite.  The junit test code will have to go
>> under
>> > the ejbcontainer-testsuite under the testsuite framework
>> > (geronimo/testsuite).
>>
>> I don't know which approach would make sense or if there is some
>> middle ground.  You have a copy of this migrated code somewhere I
>> could look at/try out?
>>
>> If we did #2 it'd obviously be a copy as OpenEJB 3 runs those tests >> about 7 times during an average build and another 5 more times on a
>> build with assemblies.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> > The beans and the ejub jars can go just about anywhere.  So I'd
>> like
>> > to solicit the suggestion of openejb and geronimo folks on where we
>> > should place them
>> >
>> > 1) Leave them where they are under openejb2/modules/openejb- itests.
>> > Get help from openejb commiters to get this commited. Unlike in
>> > previous G releases, this module would now only build the ejb
>> jars. No
>> > tests would actually run here.
>> >
>> > 2) Move/copy the ejbs to some place under testsuite and create the
>> > jars there. This will keep the ejbs and the tests together.
>> Since the
>> > moduleId (configId) in the plans should match the m2
>> artifactItem id
>> > (g:a:v:t), the moduleId in the ejb plans would then become
>> > o.a.g.testsuite.*
>> >
>> >
>> > Apart from this decision, other things that need to resolved
>> before we
>> > put this code in are
>> >
>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-288
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/ msg34995.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Prasad
>> >
>>
>>
>




Reply via email to