The tool seems to already be getting some attention from users in the community. I think, moving it out of sandbox and into devtools might increase the interest in it. That seems like a good thing to me.
-Jason Warner On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good. I'll give everyone a few days to discuss it and then call a > Vote. Thanks. > > -Donald > > Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > On 9/12/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Does this require a Vote first or does the CTR process apply here, as > the code > >> is already in our svn repo? > > > > I'd say it merely requires lazy consensus where you declare your > > intent (already done) and after a couple of days (say 72 hours) commit > > it unless someone objects. It's a good practice to call a vote (after > > a discussion) and again after 72 hours tally it and act accordingly. > > > > Jacek > > > >
