Hi Jacek, yes that's a very good idea. To be honest, I'm not sure why Sachin
called it "g-eclipse-plugin". But as Shiva has suggested I've opened a JIRA to
include it in the next release....
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-205
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/12/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Start of discussion thread.....
Hi Tim,
I'm pretty sure I asked about it (or was about to have asked, but
failed), but why is the plugin called g-eclipse-plugin? Wouldn't it be
better off if it called geronimo-eclipse-plugin? It doesn't say much
when I have g-eclipse-plugin in my eclipse plugin repository and in
discussions people tend to use geronimo-eclipse-plugin even though it
may seem to be easier to say g-eclipse-plugin and following the
plugin's name. It can be confusing.
I think I should've noted it sooner and I do appologize to talk about
it now right before the plugin is to be released and am leaning
towards -1 because of the name (I don't want to be disruptive to the
process, so just a friendly reminder I should not do that do the trick
just fine ;-))
Jacek
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
