On 9/14/07, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim, thanks for your nice instruction. I am able to do scenario 2 fine > without any prob! > > I have noticed 2 things: > > 1) one other recommended scenario (may be the most recommended scenario) > used to be not download anything, but start at define a server then > choose the link called "download additional server adapters" when a user > doesn't see the adapter he wants there. From the resulting page, he > can just download the geronimo eclipse plugin. I don't know if you or > anyone has worked with WTP team to get our geronimo server to be on the > list? > > 2) I tried to deploy a hello war project and able to deploy fine. But > right click the project and do a run as, run on server doesn't bring up > the eclipse internal web browser automatically. I wonder if someone > else has noticed this?
Yes! there seems to be a problem. I tried these: a) Created a dynamic web project and then added an index.jsp. Right click on the index.jsp file and select "Run As -> Run on Server". Everything worked fine including the internal web browser getting opened with the URL of index.jsp! An important thing to note here is that the "geronimo-web.xml" that got created was using 1.1 version of Geronimo schemas as shown below: <web-app xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-1.1"; xmlns:nam=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.1"; xmlns:sec=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/security-1.1"; xmlns:sys=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.1";> b) I now changed the schema versions in "geronimo-web.xml" as below: <web-app xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/web-2.0"; xmlns:nam=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.2"; xmlns:sec=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/security-2.0"; xmlns:sys=" http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/deployment-1.2";> When I now right click on the same "index.jsp" and select "Run As -> Run on Server" I see that the internal web browser is *not* getting opened. I see the same behaviour (as described in a) & b) above) with both WTP 2.0 & WTP 2.0.1RC1. - Shiva Lin > > > Tim McConnell wrote: > > Start of discussion thread..... > >
