I think this requires a little more discussion.
We seem to be flip-flopping on what should or should not be included in
the list of plugins to export.
GERONIMO-4141 and the discussion around it was rather explicit that we
should only include cars in the list. I believe the discussion at that
time was that any component which might potentially be exported should
specify "car" as it's module type and hence it will appear in the list.
If you specify a type of car instead of rar in the deployment plan for
the db pool it will also appear in the list of potential plugins to
export. So, perhaps the doc should be changed rather than the code (and
also perhaps change the dbpool wizard so that it includes type car
rather than rar)?
Basically, I think we need agreement before we push this change into 2.1.4.
The change is minor and wouldn't cause a problem to integrate but I'd
like to verify that we have a consistent approach to plugins.
Joe
Shawn Jiang wrote:
I really think GERONIMO-4492
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4492>should be applied
to 2.1.4. If we don't, the defect will break the published document
here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/convert-your-current-applications-into-plugins.html
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>> wrote:
After a quick read of the JIRA and patch I agree ... I'll take a
closer look and apply it if all still seems well.
Thanks,
Joe
Shawn Jiang wrote:
If possible, I think this jira should be integrated because it's
easy to be reproduced and easy to be fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4595
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Joe Bohn
<joe.b...@earthlink.net <mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net <mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>>>
wrote:
Go ahead and integrate the fix.
Regards,
Joe
Ivan wrote:
If possible,
I wish that GERONIMO-4529) Corba port 1050 is not
released after
stopping j2ee-corba-yoko configuration is included in 2.1.4.
Thanks !
Ivan
2009/3/18 Joe Bohn <joe.b...@earthlink.net
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>> <mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net
<mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net>>>>
>
> I think we're at a point where we should freeze
branches/2.1.4 in prep for a release. OpenEJB 3.0.1 is
in the
process of being released and the OpenJPA 1.2.1 vote should
close tomorrow. Those were our two primary dependencies
that we
were waiting on.
>
> Please check with Jarek or me if you would like to
integrate
any additional changes into 2.1.4. We'll hopefully be
able to
produce a release candidate later this week.
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
--
Ivan
--
Shawn
--
Shawn
