After reading some code changes of the geronimo-kenel in the sanbox, I found that we keep the Geronimo kenel as an OSGI service, and each Configuration ( or a bundle) will search it and start the configuration as we do in the past while starting. I have a feeling that, if we do that, Geronimo is still a part of OSGI env, could we make the Geronimo is an OSGI env? Could we publish GBeans as OSGI service via a ConfigurationActivator, or though a GBean-OSGI adapter ? Thanks !
2009/9/22 Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com> > Yes! hope for detail sharing :-) > -Rex > > 2009/9/22 Jack Cai <greensi...@gmail.com> > > David, that's exciting work! >> >> It'll be great if you can share some more details. There are a few puzzles >> that flow around my mind - >> * Are we just taking OSGi framework in as another plug-in to let it host >> OSGi applications? Or, vice-versa, we are converting Geronimo into an OSGi >> application? > > * If the latter case, will GBean go away? >> * If yes, how much code changes are required? I'd say a lot ... >> >> -Jack >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:25 AM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>wrote: >> >>> Over the weekend I got my sandbox osgi framework to build and generate >>> all the plugins as osgi bundles. This involves running some of the geronimo >>> server on osgi/felix inside maven. The dependency management system seems >>> to work OK at least for starting bundles. I also started doing a little bit >>> of code cleanup. >>> >>> I think the next step will be to get the framework server running in >>> standalone karaf or felix. Hopefully this will be no harder than getting it >>> running in embedded felix in maven. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> >> > -- Ivan
