+1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.

Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.


-Donald


On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +0.5
> 
> M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
> following in var/config/config.xml:
> 
> <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}</attribute>
> 
> to
> 
> <attribute name="ServerUrl">tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}</attribute>
> 
> Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
> server startup by the activemq plugin.
> 
> M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> error from time to time.
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem has
>> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
>> included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
> 

Reply via email to