Hello all, Would someone have some time to review this? I would really love to use these spec bundles for the OSGi CDI Integration reference implementation at Apache Aries.
Sincerely, - Ray On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le mar. 15 mai 2018 23:06, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> a > écrit : > >> FYI, I have to fixup the current PR because I goofed up, but I'm doing >> that now. >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Raymond >>> >>> Does it mean we can drop the providerlocator now? >>> >> >> Not with this change. >> I believe you are referring to the Service Loader Mediator [1] (like >> Aries SpiFly [2]), which I could do as a second PR if that is really wanted. >> > > If we dont need the osgi locator shade it would be a win yes. > > > >> >>> >>> +1 anyhow for the pr >>> >> > Side note: Im just back from holidays so will need some days to catch up. > Dont hesitate to ping back if no reviews next week from anyone. > > >> Great! thx >> >> [1] https://osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.loader.html >> [2] http://aries.apache.org/modules/spi-fly.html >> >> >>> >>> >>> Le mar. 15 mai 2018 21:52, Raymond Auge <raymond.a...@liferay.com> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> As some of you know several of the OSGi RIs consume the specification >>>> bundles produced by the Apache Geronimo project. >>>> >>>> In the last couple of OSGi releases we've been applying the requirement >>>> for Portable Java Contracts as part of new and updated specs. Now as the >>>> specs of OSGi Release 7 have finalized we're in need to close out the RIs. >>>> >>>> To that end I'd like to request the application of the Portable Java >>>> Contracts to the Geronimo spec bundles. >>>> >>>> I've created an issue [1] and sent a PR [2] which makes the necessary >>>> changes. >>>> >>>> Would someone be so kind as to review this? >>>> >>>> Next, if acceptable, would someone call a release? I'm not sure of the >>>> specs can be released all at once, but that would be the best case >>>> scenario. >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> - Ray >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606 >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/9 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> >>>> (@rotty3000) >>>> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> >>>> (@Liferay) >>>> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> >>>> (@OSGiAlliance) >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> >> (@rotty3000) >> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> >> (@Liferay) >> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> >> (@OSGiAlliance) >> > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
