No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so don't start
back from svn ;))

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 14 juin 2022 à 18:29, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving
> this code over to TomEE?
>
>  - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/
>  -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/
>  -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/
>  -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/
>
> These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in Jakarta EE 10.
> We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll hopefully be doing that
> by early next year.
>
> It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to here and
> submit patches against SVN repos.  It would be great if we could have them
> in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> -David
>
> > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of the Apache
> Geronimo Microprofile implementation:
> >
> > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/
> >
> > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the maintenance of
> the implementation to be up-to-date with the Microprofile specification.
> >
> > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the active EE
> server seems to be Apache TomEE.
> >
> > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile implementation
> to the Apache TomEE umbrella.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > --
> > --
> > François
> >
>
>

Reply via email to