Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 20:23, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:09 PM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which > already are. > > Agree. Currently connector and txmanager are in the same git repo. > > > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) > Aries. On the other hand they might have copied the implementation. It > might be confusing if the governing project and/or package names change. I > don’t know if there are other uses, or how to find out. > > > > It might possibly be simpler, after we get each subproject into > appropriate git repos, to make people who want to work on these > implementations geronimo committers. > > I don't know if it helps the conversation, but we need a different version > that's incompatible to what Aries and ActiveMQ uses. We would be > developing and implementing jakarta.* implementations they couldn't use. > For them to switch from javax to jakarta, they'd need to change all their > dependencies anyway. > > Really the question being asked is does anyone mind if we develop separate > Jakarta versions of the APIs on the TomEE side? It would be a little > easier for us. > Strictly speaking you dont even need to ask so maybe ask once done and if there would be any merge need if it eases work for you ;). > > -David > > >> On Jun 14, 2022, at 9:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so don't > start back from svn ;)) > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > >> > >> > >> Le mar. 14 juin 2022 à 18:29, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > a écrit : > >> Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving > this code over to TomEE? > >> > >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ > >> - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ > >> - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/ > >> - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/ > >> > >> These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in Jakarta EE > 10. We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll hopefully be doing > that by early next year. > >> > >> It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to here > and submit patches against SVN repos. It would be great if we could have > them in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of the > Apache Geronimo Microprofile implementation: > >> > > >> > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ > >> > > >> > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the maintenance > of the implementation to be up-to-date with the Microprofile specification. > >> > > >> > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the active > EE server seems to be Apache TomEE. > >> > > >> > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile > implementation to the Apache TomEE umbrella. > >> > > >> > WDYT? > >> > > >> > regards, > >> > > >> > -- > >> > -- > >> > François > >> > > >> > > > >
