And Deltaspike latest release is 1.9.4 but no 2.0.0 because we are using 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT...

On 19/03/2024 15:46, Richard Zowalla wrote:
TomEE 10 requires BatchEE 2.0.0 :-)
Don't know if we really need the Deltaspike integration (for now)


Am 19. März 2024 15:42:11 MEZ schrieb Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>:

    There is some SNAPSHOT dependencies used by BatchEE (tomEE and
    deltaspike):
    https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/blob/master/pom.xml I
    think it would be better to not use SNAPSHOT in our release. WDYT?
    regards, François On 19/03/2024 14:47, Richard Zowalla wrote:

        Great. Go for it, François :) TCK runs in GH actions. Am
        Dienstag, dem 19.03.2024 um 11:59 +0100 schrieb Francois Papon:

            Sounds good :) Let me give it a try. regards, François On
            19/03/2024 11:37, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

                Hi, mainly just "mvn release:prepare release:perform"
                then standard ASF process (dist area), my totally
                unwritten and unofficial tip would be to 1. ensure the
                build passes (mvn install) with tcks then deactivate
                the tests (skipTests in a profile property of your
                settings.xml) since it is  long and totally useless
                during the release.  Romain Manni-Bucau  @rmannibucau
                |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book Le mar.
                19 mars 2024 à 10:42, Francois Papon
                <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> a écrit :

                    Hi,  I never did release for BatchEE before but if
                    it can help I can try to  run the process.
                     regards,  François  On 19/03/2024 09:34, Richard
                    Zowalla wrote:  > Hey all,  >  > since the PR got
                    merged, can anyone trigger a release for BatchEE
                    2.0.0  > ? The TCK challenge is open and might
                    take some more time until it is  > resolved, but I
                    don't think, that we need to wait that long.  >  >
wdyt?  >  > Gruß  > Richard  >

Reply via email to