Seems like private wasn't moved to bcc. Moving it this time. On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:35 PM Abhishek Tiwari <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> Replies inline. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I support the graduation, but we have some work to clean things up first. >> You probably don't want to use both private@ and dev@ in the same >> message, because it can cause mistakes. I've moved private to bbc. >> > *Abhishek: *Ack. Thanks. > >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:48 PM Abhishek Tiwari <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I wanted to start a conversation about our readiness to graduate. We >>> have come a long way since we incubated in Apache, with: >>> >>> - 1700+ contributions from 96 contributors >>> - 3 releases under 2 different release managers >>> - 5 committers invited (all accepted) >>> - New Apache website setup [A] >>> - Issue tracking migrated to Jira [B] >>> - Dev conversations moved to d...@gobblin.incubator.org >>> - Diverse committers and PMCs (from 9 companies / institutes) >>> - We have built a meritocratic and open collaborative progress (the >>> Apache way) >>> >>> I think as next steps before moving to a formal vote, we need to: >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-131> >>> 1. Update Apache Gobblin (incubating) page [C] >>> >> >> >> 1. We need someone to use Apache RAT to make sure the code has Apache >> licenses on all of the files. >> >> *Abhishek:* I had run it once when we incubated in Apache, since then we > have been diligent about accepting PRs. However, I will run it once again > for sanity. So, I will sign up for this. > >> >> 1. Does someone have the link to the software grant? >> >> *Abhishek: * Forwarded to you and cc'd private. It was acknowledged and > registered at the time, should it be in some document repository that it > isn't? > >> >> 1. Has anyone built the transitive graph of the dependency tree to >> build the binary NOTICE file? >> >> *Abhishek: *Yes, I had done that during incubation. We should perhaps > refresh that. > >> >> 1. Someone has to look into why https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ >> doesn't >> think we have added committers. I can take that one. >> >> *Abhishek: *This is interesting, didn't knew about Clutch. No idea why > it thinks that we haven't added any committers. Thanks for checking! > >> >> >>> <https://incubator.apache.org/projects/gobblin.html> >>> 2. Formally assess ourselves against Apache maturity model [D] >>> >> >> This one is actually optional. >> > *Abhishek: *Oh, nice to know. > >> >> >>> 3. Perform podling name search [E] >>> 4. Review and update roster >>> 5. Review and update documentation wherever necessary >>> >>> I can start with 1 & 2, and I saw Owen is already looking into 4. I >>> might need our mentor's help with 1. >>> Does anyone want to look at 3, and 5? >>> >> >> We also need to address the checks of the website - >> https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/ >> > *Abhishek: *Some flags look similar to those caught by Clutch, I will try > to address those. > >> >> > .. Owen >> >> >>> What do folks think? >>> >>> [A] https://gobblin.incubator.apache.org/ >>> [B] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GOBBLIN/issues/ >>> [C] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/gobblin.html >>> [D] >>> http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html >>> >>> [E] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-131 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Abhishek >>> >>>
