On 07/05/2013, at 10:50 PM, Steve Ebersole <steven.ebers...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that neither is correct and that this is yet another manifestation of > bad Maven design. > > But... > > This is a POM. It is specifically a Maven artifact. In my opinion this > needs to follow Maven conventions. That seems to be the way you are leaning > as well given the plan you are describing below. > > I'd really like to stick with the Publication DSL. It is much > simpler/better. I updated my plugins to work with it. And I'd like to keep > testing it for y'all. Thanks for doing this. This new DSL is so long overdue (you know this as much as anyone) and it's nice to make a start on it, but we certainly don't think it's 'finished' yet. Your feedback is really useful for driving what we tackle next with the DSL: what's missing, what's confusing, and so on. -- Adam Murdoch Gradle Co-founder http://www.gradle.org VP of Engineering, Gradleware Inc. - Gradle Training, Support, Consulting http://www.gradleware.com Join us at the Gradle Summit 2013, June 13th and 14th in Santa Clara, CA: http://www.gradlesummit.com
