Hi all, Great to hear that we will have something new in the plan.
It is so happy to me to see that there will be new arch draft in 2 days. At the same time, I would like to raise up some of my ideas/comments related to the new arch before we decided to go 1. What’s the good part and bad part for the existing arch? I agree that the current arch which were defined 4 years ago is not good enough for the ongoing requirement. So I would like to recommend that compile a list of expected change from arch level, so we can start from there, to discuss the priority and scope. 2. We might need to define/re-define high level principles helping us clarify the vision, if it is not clear enough now. We need some brain storming to collect more ideas about what griffin should do and what should not. 3. We need to check with what is the main pain points of current user, and try to solve them in the arch level. I will go through all the jira issues and classify them to several categories. And I will keep update the status. Please let me know your comments. On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 12:53 AM Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Willem, > > I am Grant Guo, PMC member of the Griffin project, apache ID: xuexu > > Since last December, William, me, and other PMC members have been > discussing the feasibility of the rule-based solution, which could bring > Griffin to a new level in terms of usability, extensibility, etc. > > A new architectural proposal will be posted soon. > > Thanks > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 6:08 PM Willem Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There has been no development activity on this project for more than 5 > > months. The PMC has failed to submit several board reports. Without a > > community or anyone working on the project, there is no project. > > > > If any of the PMC members are still active, please indicate so by > > responding to this email. > > > > Thank you, all! I hope everyone is safe and healthy. > > > > Willem Jiang > >
