Calling it 3.0.0-jdk7 would reduce confusion and increase 3.0 adaption On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:04 PM Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 12:23 +1000, Paul King wrote: > > 2.6 is just 3.0 backported to JDK7 (minus those features which don't > > backport easily without a JVM8). > > Most users should be skipping 2.6 and going straight to 3.0 which is > > where > > our focus should be ... soon. > > 2.6 is meant to help people start moving towards Parrot who are stuck > > on > > JDK7. Given it has limitations > > anyway, I wouldn't imagine we'd do anything more than a 2.6.0 release > > - > > unless other community > > members contributed the PRs to advance it. > > > > Sounds like it isn't a 2.6.0 at all then. Should it be called 3.0.0- > jdk7 so as to reflect what it actually is? > > > > > -- > Russel. > =========================================== > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk >
