On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 18:02 +0100, Cédric Champeau wrote: > I don't think calling it 3.0-jdk7 is a good thing to do: the runtime > would > be different, with different bugs. Plus, it would add confusion on > some > build tools, with random dependencies on jdk7, or indy, or ... > > I think we should focus on getting 2.5 out, and then go with 3.0 > asap.
The implication is to ignore Groovy 3.0.0 on JDK7. This sounds like A Very Good Idea™ -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
