I'm ok with that timeline. We probably need goals for "dotted" releases also (like 5.1 where we can improve for example performance)
Thanks, Mikhail 2006/11/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really not for me to say, but for us to say. Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line? Mid 2007 : Java SE 5 End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java SE 6 classlib changes...) End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun does Java SE 7...") geir
