I actually agree with both of you.
We definitely need to include other benchmarks - especially open ones -
besides the SPEC benchmarks, because at this point, we as a project
don't have the SPEC ones. I'm very +1 on Dacapo, and actually any
others that we find. Dacapo is nice because there are serious pros
actively working on and around it.
On the other hand, it's a sad reality that we can't ignore SPEC either,
because that is how some people measure performance.
geir
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
no. not at all
2006/11/27, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Not sure that when we elect an official benchmark we should take
> into account whether it's open or not.
You're kidding, right?
--
Stefano.