I actually agree with both of you.

We definitely need to include other benchmarks - especially open ones - besides the SPEC benchmarks, because at this point, we as a project don't have the SPEC ones. I'm very +1 on Dacapo, and actually any others that we find. Dacapo is nice because there are serious pros actively working on and around it.

On the other hand, it's a sad reality that we can't ignore SPEC either, because that is how some people measure performance.

geir

Mikhail Loenko wrote:
no. not at all

2006/11/27, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:

> Not sure that when we elect an official benchmark we should take
> into account whether it's open or not.

You're kidding, right?

--
Stefano.


Reply via email to