I would rather call this "misunderstanding". Jesse run one set of tests, Tim expected another set. One way to correct the problem is to agree that committers run a specific minimal set of tests, for example, on one platform. I thought we had such agreements documented, but failed to find a proper pointer. It seems to me now that instead of formal pre-commit rules we had Stepan Mishura who guided us informally.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17/Nov/2009 03:50, Nathan Beyer wrote: >> 2009/11/16 Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>: >>> Funny. We don't have a requirement that a committer have to test the >>> code before committing it here [1]. >> >> I suppose some things are just assumed. >> >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/NewCommitter > > Of course, we are all grown-ups. Mistakes happen. > > How close are we to being able to run all the tests via Hudson? > I recall that there was discussion and work on packaging the tests so > they can be run from the HDK. I don't recall it being declared 'done'? > > Regards, > Tim > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://www.expressaas.com/ http://openmeetings.googlecode.com/
