Ok, done.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Nathan Beyer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/11/17 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>: >> I would rather call this "misunderstanding". >> >> Jesse run one set of tests, Tim expected another set. One way to > > If you think it should be documented on the wiki, go ahead and do it - > it's open and intended to be less formal than the proper web site. > > -Nathan > >> correct the problem is to agree that committers run a specific minimal >> set of tests, for example, on one platform. I thought we had such >> agreements documented, but failed to find a proper pointer. It seems >> to me now that instead of formal pre-commit rules we had Stepan >> Mishura who guided us informally. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 17/Nov/2009 03:50, Nathan Beyer wrote: >>>> 2009/11/16 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]>: >>>>> Funny. We don't have a requirement that a committer have to test the >>>>> code before committing it here [1]. >>>> >>>> I suppose some things are just assumed. >>>> >>>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/NewCommitter >>> >>> Of course, we are all grown-ups. Mistakes happen. >>> >>> How close are we to being able to run all the tests via Hudson? >>> I recall that there was discussion and work on packaging the tests so >>> they can be run from the HDK. I don't recall it being declared 'done'? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, >> http://www.telecom-express.ru/ >> http://harmony.apache.org/ >> http://www.expressaas.com/ >> http://openmeetings.googlecode.com/ >> > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://www.expressaas.com/ http://openmeetings.googlecode.com/
