dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Dalvik's Javadoc Tim Ellison
  • Re: Dalvik's Javadoc enh
• [build] Remove "clean" dependency from "bundle-src" targets Mark Hindess
• [Discuss]Using hdk to run ant Charles Lee
  • Re: [Discuss]Using hdk to run ant Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Discuss]Using hdk to run ant Charles Lee
• [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jim Yu
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Tim Ellison
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One sebb
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Tim Ellison
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Tim Ellison
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Tim Ellison
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Ray Chen
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
  • Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One Mark Hindess
• [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures Nathan Beyer
  • Re: [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures Mark Hindess
  • test excludes (was [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures) Mark Hindess
  • Re: test excludes (was [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures) sebb
  • Re: test excludes Tim Ellison
  • Re: test excludes sebb
  • Re: test excludes Tim Ellison
  • Re: test excludes sebb
  • Re: test excludes Mark Hindess
  • Re: test excludes Tim Ellison
  • Re: test excludes Mark Hindess
  • Re: test excludes (was [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures) Nathan Beyer
  • Re: test excludes Mark Hindess
  • Re: test excludes Nathan Beyer
  • Re: test excludes Mark Hindess
  • Re: test excludes Nathan Beyer
  • Re: test excludes (was [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures) Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures Tim Ellison
  • Re: [proposal] For future milestones, expect zero test failures Nathan Beyer
• [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 sebb
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Ray Chen
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Ray Chen
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • [result] [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2 Tim Ellison
• [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 sebb
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Nathan Beyer
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Nathan Beyer
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Nathan Beyer
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Charles Lee
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Tim Ellison
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Nathan Beyer
  • [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [result] [vote] Declare r946978 as 5.0 milestone 14 Tim Ellison
• How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Lang Yang
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Alexey Petrenko
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Nathan Beyer
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Lang Yang
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Mark Hindess
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Lang Yang
  • Re: How to test properly when dependent class is not included in RI Lang Yang
• [Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010 Tim Ellison
• [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • [build] Windows build failure (was: Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2) Tim Ellison
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Mark Hindess
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Mark Hindess
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [build] Windows build failure Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Catherine Hope
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Regis
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Regis
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Regis
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Oliver Deakin
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Regis
  • Re: [general] Code Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Oliver Deakin
• Blank constructor throwing NotImplementedException Lang Yang
  • Re: Blank constructor throwing NotImplementedException Nathan Beyer
• [general] Feature Freeze for Milestone 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 Mark Hindess
• Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6507) [classlib][imageio] Implementation for ordering feature of ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
• [build] Merging back changes from my test branch Mark Hindess
  • Re: [build] Merging back changes from my test branch Jimmy,Jing Lv
• [testing][gc]Problems about verbose information when using "-Xtrace:gc -Xverbose:gc" Li QuanLong
• Common hyfile_write bug Mark Hindess
• Re: svn commit: r938116 - /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/platform/Environment.java Nathan Beyer
  • Re: svn commit: r938116 - /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/platform/Environment.java Oliver Deakin
• [classlib][ASN1] Tobias Braun
  • Re: [classlib][ASN1] Mark Hindess
• [testing]Build error with Apache Harmony 5.0M13 (r91 Li QuanLong
  • Re: [testing]Build error with Apache Harmony 5.0M13 (r91 Xiao-Feng Li
  • Re: Re: [testing]Build error with Apache Harmony 5.0M13 (r91 Li QuanLong
  • Re: [testing]Build error with Apache Harmony 5.0M13 (r91 Oliver Deakin
• Build Test System Colin Fitzpatrick
  • Re: Build Test System Mark Hindess
  • Re: Build Test System Colin Fitzpatrick
  • Re: Build Test System Nathan Beyer
• [general]Exception in testing SPECjbb2005 liuxv
• [drlvm][gc]: UNIQUE MARK SWEEP gc failed when running specjvm2008 dennis.xlc
  • Re: [drlvm][gc]: UNIQUE MARK SWEEP gc failed when running specjvm2008 Ligang Wang
• [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Tim Ellison
  • Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Jimmy,Jing Lv
  • Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates Jim Yu
• [general] Open Source Jumpstart London 2010 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Open Source Jumpstart London 2010 Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [general] Open Source Jumpstart London 2010 Mark Hindess
  • Re: [general] Open Source Jumpstart London 2010 Alexei Fedotov
• Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Kevin Zhou
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Mark Hindess
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Mark Hindess
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Kevin Zhou
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ sebb
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Kevin Zhou
  • Re: svn commit: r935847 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/internal/net/www/protocol/file/ Mark Hindess
• JIRA attachments Mark Hindess
  • Re: JIRA attachments Mark Hindess
• [GSoC] Prosposal for HARMONY-6445 Pons Rudy
• Re: svn commit: r934733 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib: make/ modules/crypto/make/ modules/lang-management/make/ modules/luni/make/ modules/security/make/ modules/x-net/make/ Oliver Deakin
  • Re: svn commit: r934733 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib: make/ modules/crypto/make/ modules/lang-management/make/ modules/luni/make/ modules/security/make/ modules/x-net/make/ Mark Hindess
  • Re: svn commit: r934733 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib: make/ modules/crypto/make/ modules/lang-management/make/ modules/luni/make/ modules/security/make/ modules/x-net/make/ Catherine Hope
  • [classlib] hy.test.impl option (was Re: svn commit: r934733 ...) Mark Hindess
• [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Alexei Fedotov
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Lang Yang
  • Re: [classlib][ImageIO] Ordering in ServiceRegistry Lang Yang
• Re: [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-6139) [classlib][luni][java6] java.util.Arrays.binarySearch(short[] array, int startIndex, int endIndex, short value) should return (-(insertion point) - 1) rather than -1 if value is not found in the given range Ray
• Re: svn commit: r931940 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnectionImpl.java test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/net/HttpURLConnectionTest.java Oliver Deakin
  • Re: svn commit: r931940 - in /harmony/enhanced/java/trunk/classlib/modules/luni/src: main/java/org/apache/harmony/luni/internal/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnectionImpl.java test/api/common/org/apache/harmony/luni/tests/java/net/HttpURLConnectionTest.java Regis
• Re: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64-full-tests #156 Mark Hindess
• [GSoC] Submit ICLA/ACQ Meng Li
  • Re: [GSoC] Submit ICLA/ACQ Mark Hindess

• Earlier messages
• Later messages