Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the testing I did today leads me to +1.
J-D On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > Some notes, no vote yet: > > - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the > link is wrong. > > - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack > is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain > why it's missing. > > J-D > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the >> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available >> here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/ >> >> You can also browse the candidate documentation here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/ >> >> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80 >> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for >> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See >> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list. >> >> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of >> developer releases? >> >> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information >> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In >> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate >> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major >> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its >> definitely not for production deploys. >> >> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master >> code has gone in. >> >> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th. >> >> Thanks, >> St.Ack >> >> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions >> >
