I ran this release on 15 nodes and used Import to pull in some data, the performance was great and all went well.
+1 On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over > night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test > assignment at startup. Looks good. +1 > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm +1 >> >> I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate >> and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it >> basically worked. >> >> St.Ack >> >> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the >> > testing I did today leads me to +1. >> > >> > J-D >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Some notes, no vote yet: >> >> >> >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the >> >> link is wrong. >> >> >> >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack >> >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain >> >> why it's missing. >> >> >> >> J-D >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the >> >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available >> >>> here: >> >>> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/ >> >>> >> >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here: >> >>> >> >>> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/ >> >>> >> >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80 >> >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for >> >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See >> >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list. >> >>> >> >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of >> >>> developer releases? >> >>> >> >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information >> >>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In >> >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate >> >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major >> >>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its >> >>> definitely not for production deploys. >> >>> >> >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master >> >>> code has gone in. >> >>> >> >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> St.Ack >> >>> >> >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
