Ran the rc on my five node test cluster against CDH3b2 with a YCSB load over night, inserted 500GB. Shut down and restarted the cluster to test assignment at startup. Looks good. +1
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm +1 > > I did a bunch of heavy duty testing before putting up the candidate > and I just now pulled down the RC, checked its docs and made sure it > basically worked. > > St.Ack > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Unless anyone thinks that what I listed is bad enough to sink, the > > testing I did today leads me to +1. > > > > J-D > > > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Some notes, no vote yet: > >> > >> - The images in the documentation aren't showing up, looks like the > >> link is wrong. > >> > >> - HBASE-2892 was committed to the branch but it's not included. Stack > >> is telling me he had trouble building and that maybe it could explain > >> why it's missing. > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I just made a second release candidate from the tip of the > >>> 0.89.2010726 branch. Source binary and source tar balls are available > >>> here: > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/ > >>> > >>> You can also browse the candidate documentation here: > >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.89.20100726-candidate-2/hbase-0.89.20100726/docs/ > >>> > >>> Issues resolved since 0.89.20100621, our first 0.89.x release, are ~80 > >>> issues including our first cut at a working replication (and a fix for > >>> HBASE-2755, the issue that sunk release candidate 1): See > >>> http://su.pr/2lZsHk for the complete list. > >>> > >>> Shall we release this candidate as the second in our 0.89.x series of > >>> developer releases? > >>> > >>> Please see previous threads on 0.89 releases for more information > >>> about the purpose of this release candidate. Also see [1]. In > >>> particular, these 'developer releases' are for those who can tolerate > >>> risk and who are willing to give feedback in advance of our next major > >>> release. We're not making any guarantees that this is bug free. Its > >>> definitely not for production deploys. > >>> > >>> We'll do another release like this in a few weeks after the new master > >>> code has gone in. > >>> > >>> Please vote by Wednesday, August 4th. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> St.Ack > >>> > >>> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HBaseVersions > >>> > >> > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
