On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > The implementation is implemented as a coprocessor, but requires the > coprocessor framework and pluggable RPC (and the secure RPC engine) to be > included into core. So far we have successfully upstreamed the coprocessor > framework, into 0.92. Inclusion of pluggable RPC (and the secure RPC engine) > into 0.92 could happen, but my understanding is the PMC consensus is > pluggable RPC, and the Maven build refactoring necessary, would delay the > release unacceptably. So this has been "accepted" in principle for 0.94. I > put 'accepted' in quotes because I can't say there is any commitment to do > this. >
I do not know of any such PMC consensus. Its not been discussed nor voted on up on private (You are on the PMC so you'd know). > So we should have this discussion, before responding. > I'm not that interested in discussing because as I see it, there is nothing to discuss. We need the security you fellas have been working on. Seems like committing it will disrupt the build and src tree layout. Gary was holding off till we branched but 0.92 branching is taking too long. + Lets branch this friday, or next? + And or, run a vote on whether we should commit security now before we branch or after St.Ack
